Mini ReviewOpen Access

Mini review - Clinical and physiological aspects of pain in parkinson's disease

Eduardo NC Bergamaschi1, Fernanda C Nunes2,3, Victor W de Oliveira3, Alessandra Laitart3, Maria L Benevides3, Jean C Nunes2,3

1Serviço de Neurologia, Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
2Neurodiagnostic Brasil, Diagnósticos em Neuropatologia, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.
3Division of Neuropathology, Hospital Universitário (HU), UFSC, Florianópolis, SC, Brazil.

 Pain is a common and often disabling symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD) which has received increasing attention in recent years. Headache represents a common form of pain among the general population, but there are few studies on this symptom in PD. In 2014, our group reported a lower prevalence of headache in PD patients compared to the general population, as well as an association between the predominant side of headache and the side of initial motor signs of PD. Since then, there has been few new data on the specific issue of headache in PD patients, though several recent studies have contributed to the understanding of pain in PD, both in terms of clinical and pathophysiological aspects, including new observations on pain association with side of motor symptom onset. Here, we review those studies, and re-discuss our own findings in comparison to the current information available. A better comprehension of pain physiology in PD could facilitate the development of new therapeutic approaches, thus providing a better quality of life for PD patients.


Pain is a common and often disabling symptom in Parkinson’s disease (PD)1. Headache represents a common form of pain, but there are few studies about headache in PD2. In an article published in 2014, we reported the prevalence and characteristics of headache in 100 consecutive PD patients2. They were compared to 98 age- and gender-matched controls from a Brazilian population-based epidemiological study2,3. We found a statistically significant lower prevalence of headache in PD patients. It was also shown that, when the PD patients’ headache was unilateral, its predominant side was ipsilateral to the side of initial motor signs of PD, with 84% concordance (p < 0.01)2.

Although the study design did not allow a cause-effect relationship, we hypothesized that this association could be explained by some protective effect of PD against headache. Since then, many works have addressed the issue of pain in PD4-17. Here, we reviewed the new findings about pain in PD, and re-discuss our hypothesis in the light of the current information.

Pain in PD is frequent1,4-6, can be disabling1 and have an important impact on the patients’ quality of life4. Pain is reported among the symptoms of PD since the earliest publications on the subject, and is noted for being capable of overshadowing the motor symptoms of the disease1. A recent study reported a significant association between pain and poorer quality of life and more severe depression in PD patients4. Therefore, pain emerges as an important non-motor symptom (NMS) of PD, albeit an often overlooked one1.

In order to provide better diagnosis and comprehension of pain in PD, several pain classification systems in PD have been designed4, of which the system proposed by Ford1 remains the most cited4. The author classified pain in PD in five categories: musculoskeletal, radicular/neuropathic, dystonic, central/primary and akathisia1. According to this system, PD-related headache is classified as central/primary pain1. This scheme was used in several papers reviewed here4-6, and the relative frequency of each category of pain is exposed in Table 1.

Reference Musculoskeletal% Radicular/neuropathic% Dystonic% Central/primary% Akathisia%
Valkovic p et al4 41.0 27.0 17.0 22.0 a
Rana A et al5 28.0 36.0 48.0 b 29.0
Mao CJ et al6 47.1 47.1 23.5 7.4


Table 1: Relative frequency of each category of pain in Parkinson's disease (Ford’s classification).

aReference4 did not access akathisia

bReference5 did not describe the prevalence for central/primary pain

Although no new published research has specifically assessed the frequency and characteristics of headache in PD, many studies in recent years have investigated the prevalence of pain among PD patients and factors that could be related to its occurrence4-6. Valkovic et al. reported a 76.0% prevalence of overall pain (OP) among PD patients in a cross-sectional study, though headache was not referred in this population4. OP was found to be worse in patients with advanced PD, with patients with advanced disease reporting more frequently musculoskeletal, radicular/neuropathic, dystonic and central/primary pain4. Patients with early PD reported more frequently pain that could not be classified under those categories, thus being put under the label “other pain”4. A Canadian study identified a prevalence of 66.0% of OP5. Severity of PD showed no association with OP level5. Mao et al. investigated possible associations between PD-related OP and other NMS6. They reported a prevalence of OP among PD cases of 47.9%, and observed that PD patients with pain had more severe PD and scored higher in a depression questionnaire and lower in cognitive tests, with statistical significance6. In 2014, clinical differences between 39 PD patients with mutations in the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA) and 539 sporadic PD controls were compared7. Four patients with GBA-associated PD and 16 controls with sporadic PD presented with OP as an initial symptom7. A single study evaluated OP in PD, multiple system atrophy (MSA) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), reporting a greater prevalence in PD and MSA in comparison to PSP (89.0%, 81.0% and 25.0%, respectively), as well as a lower intensity of OP in PSP8.

Tong et al9 found an inverse association between plasmatic levels of serotonin and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid and OP among PD patients, as well as lower plasmatic levels of both substances in PD patients when compared to healthy controls, and proposed that serotonergic dysfunction could play a role in PD, particularly in the genesis of NMS like pain9. This research group had published an article one year earlier, investigating a possible correlation between PD NMS and plasmatic levels of glutamate, aspartate, γ-aminobutiric acid and glycine but, despite having found associations between plasma amino acids and depression and sleep disturbances, there was no significant correlation to OP10.

One study using a quantitative technique to measure fiber-selective sensory thresholds compared the current perception and pain tolerance thresholds (CPT and PTT, respectively) between PD patients and controls11. CPT represents the intensity of an electrical stimulus at which the subject becomes aware of its presence, while PTT represents the intensity of such stimulus above which the subject perceives such stimulus as intolerable pain11. The method applied by the authors allows discrimination between Aβ-, Aδ- and C-fiber CPT and PTT11. It showed, with statistical significance, that patients had higher CPT for all three types of fibers and lower PTT for Aβ and Aδ fibers than controls. Patients who reported painful symptoms had statistically significant higher Aδ- and C-fiber CPT than those without pain. PD subjects with OP also had lower PTT, though without statistical significance11. These findings have led the authors to propose a role for abnormal sensory inputs in the pathogenesis of pain in PD11.

Another study applied a well-established conditioned pain modulation (CPM) paradigm to 25 PD patients and 30 controls12. The paradigm combined painful heat stimuli and a cold pressor task as the conditioning stimulus12. No significant differences between both groups in pain modulation were found, and no significant effect of levodopa on CPM was shown12. Once CPM evaluates the efficacy of descending pain inhibition mechanisms, the authors concluded that PD is not associated with impairment of endogen pain inhibition beyond the age-related decline12.

Maegawa et al. analyzed the effects of nigrostriatal pathway lesions on nociception using a PD murine model13. Face rubbing in rats with chemical lesion of the left medial forebrain bundle was compared to that of control rats after nociceptive stimulus to the upper lip. Between 10 and 90 minutes after the stimulus, face rubbing was larger in PD-model rats13. From these data, it was inferred that nigrostriatal damage resulted in hypersensitivity to chemical painful stimulation. The authors suggested that dopamine may play a role in the modulation of inflammatory pain and central sensitization13.

Our work reported a significant positive association between side of PD motor symptom onset and side of headache in those patients who reported unilateral headache2. Similarly, Rana et al. found an association between right-sided pain and PD motor symptoms onset on the right side5. Interestingly, such a relationship was not observed with left-sided pain5. Kresojevi? detected a high concordance between side of motor symptom onset and side of OP was high among the subjects who reported pain, with all 4 GBA cases and 14 out of 16 controls having OP localized to the upper limb ipsilateral to the motor symptoms onset, but the study only assessed pain as an initial symptom, and the number of PD patients who reported pain as the presenting symptom was small (20), and inferential analysis on this issue was not performed7. The study with PD-model rats has also addressed this issue, revealing that PD-model rats showed hypersensitivity to painful stimuli, particularly worse ipsilaterally to the nigrostriatal involvement13.

In contrast, Mao found no significant relationship between side of motor symptom onset and side of OP6. Also, in the work of Chen, no association between sensory function or pain tolerance and the side of more severe motor symptoms was detected11.

Though the data available are limited and the methods employed in different studies vary, some studies have observed that pain syndromes occur more frequently in the same side as the motor symptoms in PD.

Rana did not find any significant associations between presence of dopaminergic therapies (DT) and pain scores, though 40% reported subjective improvement with the medication5. Simillarly, in Mao’s work the daily equivalent dose of levodopa of the patients with OP was not higher than that of those without OP6. One study showed rates of subjective improvement of OP after DT of 51.0%, 57.0% and 25.0% for PD, MSA and PSP, respectively8. CPT and PTT were not affected by DT11, and DT did not influence CPM12. A proper comparison of these studies in regard to a possible effect of DT on pain in PD is difficult, because the methods and study designs are heterogeneous. Nonetheless, most of them suggest DT has no objective effect on pain. A randomized controlled trial of DT in PD having as primary outcome the reduction of OP would perhaps clarify this issue.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as an effective treatment for motor symptoms of PD14. Its impact on NMS of PD has been increasingly investigated, providing new insights into the pathophysiology of pain in PD.

A cohort followed 41 PD patients who underwent subthalamic nucleus DBS (STN-DBS), assessing OP and NMS before and one year after surgery14. An improvement of OP after STN-DBS was shown, particularly of dystonic and musculoskeletal pain14. Neuropathic and central pain were not influenced by the procedure14. The authors did not find any association between motor symptom improvement and OP reduction after STN-DBS14. A previous study with a similar design had found a significant reduction of sensory and affective aspects of pain in a sample of 58 PD patients after STN-DBS, and that effect was independent of motor improvement15. Another work followed and evaluated OP in PD patients for 8 years after STN-DBS, documenting an improvement of OP in all 24 subjects, though no objective method for pain intensity quantification was employed16. It also reported that 3 out of 24 selected PD patients had headache16. A cohort published in 2015 reported an improvement of OP and lower back pain in PD patients after STN-DBS17.

It has been consistently shown that STN-DBS may reduce OP14-17, and that effect seems to be independent of the procedure’s benefit on parkinsonian motor symptoms14,15. Once DBS mainly acts on the nigrostriatal pathways via STN stimulation, thus increasing thalamocortical excitation, it seems plausible that basal ganglia may play a direct role in pain modulation.

Even with a high prevalence of OP among PD patients4-6, headache itself does not seem to be a common complain4,16. That is in accordance with our case-control study, in which a lower occurrence of headache was observed in PD subjects2. Both headache and OP may be more frequently ipsilateral to motor symptoms in PD2,5,7,13, though study results are conflicting and data are lacking to make a definite assumption.

The genesis of pain in PD may be more related to abnormal sensory input pathways11 than to impaired pain-inhibiting mechanisms12. In the animal model of PD, nigrostriatal damage was shown to produce central sensitization13. Serotonergic dysfunction may also be involved in the pathophysiology of pain in PD9.

Although the analysis of DT on pain in PD did not show any significant association5,6,8,11, STN-DBS was shown to reduce pain in PD4-17, and that reduction seems to be independent of the benefit of DBS on motor symptoms14,15. Once STN-DBS increases thalamocortical activation, these findings could mean that the basal ganglia may participate in pain modulation mechanisms that, when dysfunctional, could lead to the generation of pain in PD independently of motor symptoms.

The reason why headache is so uncommon in PD despite the high frequency of OP is still elusive. PD impairment of pain modulation circuits may be selective for certain painful syndromes, increasing the occurrence of certain kinds of pain while decreasing others. Data about headache in PD is scarce and more comprehensive and high-quality descriptive studies are necessary in order to better characterize this symptom and its occurrence in PD. Conversely, studies employing functional imaging to compare PD patients and controls in regard to patterns of brain activation to painful stimuli could a promote a better comprehension of the mechanisms through which PD affects pain modulation.

  1. Ford B. Pain in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord 2010; 25 Suppl 1: S98–103
  2. Nunes JC, Costa Bergamaschi EN, Freitas FC, Diaz AP, Queiroz LP, Debona R, et al. Prevalence of headache in patients with Parkinson's disease and its association with the side of motor symptom onset. Neurol Sci 2014 Apr; 35(4): 595-600.
  3. Queiroz LP, Peres MF, Piovesan EJ, Kowacs F, Ciciarelli MC, Souza JA, et al. A nationwide population-based study of migraine in Brazil. Cephalalgia 2009; 29(6): 642-9.
  4. Valkovic P, Minar M, Singliarova H, Harsany J, Hanakova M, Martinkova J, Benetin J. Pain in Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study of Its Prevalence, Types, and Relationship to Depression and Quality of Life. PLoS One 2015; 10(8): e0136541.
  5. Rana A, Saeed U, Masroor MS, Yousuf MS, Siddiqui I. A cross-sectional study investigating clinical predictors and physical experiences of pain in Parkinson's disease. Funct Neurol 2013; 28(4): 297-304.
  6. Mao CJ, Chen JP, Zhang XY, Chen Y, Li SJ, Li J, et al. Parkinson's disease patients with pain suffer from more severe NMS. Neurol Sci 2015; 36(2): 263-8.
  7. Kresojevi? N, Jankovi? M, Petrovi? I, Kumar KR, Dragaševi? N, Dobri?i? V, et al. Presenting symptoms of GBA-related Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015 Jul; 21(7): 804-7.
  8. Kass-Iliyya L, Kobylecki C, McDonald KR, Gerhard A, Silverdale MA. Pain in multiple system atrophy and progressive supranuclear palsy compared to Parkinson's disease. Brain Behav 2015 May; 5(5): e00320.
  9. Tong Q, Zhang L, Yuan Y, Jiang S, Zhang R, Xu Q, et al. Reduced plasma serotonin and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid levels in Parkinson's disease are associated with nonmotor symptoms. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015 Aug; 21(8): 882-7.
  10. Tong Q, Xu Q, Xia Q, Yuan Y, Zhang L, Sun H, et al. Correlations between plasma levels of amino acids and nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna) 2015 Mar; 122(3): 411-7.
  11. Chen Y, Mao CJ, Li SJ, Wang F, Chen J, Zhang HJ, et al. Quantitative and fiber-selective evaluation of pain and sensory dysfunction in patients with Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2015 Apr; 21(4): 361-5.
  12. Grashorn W, Schunke O, Buhmann C, Forkmann K, Diedrich S, Wesemann K, Bingel U. Influence of Dopaminergic Medication on Conditioned Pain Modulation in Parkinson's Disease Patients. PLoS One 2015 Aug 13; 10(8): e0135287.
  13. Maegawa H, Morimoto Y, Kudo C, Hanamoto H, Boku A, Sugimura M, et al. Neural mechanism underlying hyperalgesic response to orofacial pain in Parkinson's disease model rats. Neurosci Res 2015 Jul; 96: 59-68.
  14. Cury RG, Galhardoni R, Fonoff ET, Dos Santos Ghilardi MG, Fonoff F, Arnaut D, et al. Effects of deep brain stimulation on pain and other nonmotor symptoms in Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2014 Oct 14; 83(16): 1403-9.
  15. Pellaprat J, Ory-Magne F, Canivet C, Simonetta-Moreau M, Lotterie JA, Radji F, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus improves pain in Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2014 Jun; 20(6): 662-4.
  16. Jung YJ, Kim HJ, Jeon BS, Park H, Lee WW, Paek SH. An 8-Year Follow-up on the Effect of Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation on Pain in Parkinson Disease. JAMA Neurol 2015 May; 72(5): 504-10.
  17. Smith H, Gee L, Kumar V, Ramirez-Zamora A, Durphy J, Hanspal E, et al. Deep brain stimulation significantly decreases disability from low back pain in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 2015; 93(3): 206-11.

Article Info

Article Notes

  • Published on: August 25, 2016


  • Parkinson’s disease
  • epidemiological
  • predominant


 Jean Costa Nunes, M.D., 
Ph.D., Division of Neuropathology, Serviço de
Anatomia Patológica, 1st floor, Hospital
Universitário Polydoro Ernani de São Thiago,
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina
(UFSC), Rua Professora Maria Flora 
Pausewang, Trindade, Florianópolis, Santa
Catarina (SC), Brazil, Zip Code: 88040-000;
Telephone: +55 4891641334;
Fax number: +55 4837218045;